Skip to content
  • Home
  • Author
    • Background
    • Held Offices
    • Recognition
    • Awards / Honors
  • Press
  • Contact
Home Judicial Philosophy

Category: Judicial Philosophy

Judicial Philosophy / January 12, 2007 / Leave a comment

Here is to Relativism in the Law

As a newly elected Maryland General Assembly prepares to open its next session, its potential work product in 2007 becomes…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / January 11, 2007 / Leave a comment

The Politics of Judicial Selection

My last few columns have discussed “Facing the Challenge of Finding and Picking Good Judges” and “What Skills and Characteristics…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / October 10, 2006 / Leave a comment

The Great Judge Learned Hand described the life of a judge better than I ever could on my own

As the Holiday Season unfolds and on a point of personal privilege with my editor’s permission, I will depart from…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / October 2, 2006 / Leave a comment

Philosophy of Legal Pragmatism

In my last column, I discussed the judicial philosophy of Legal Pragmatism as its originator, Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo,…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / July 29, 2006 / Leave a comment

The Juvenile Justice System

My final column before the election will focus on an issue that has been debated in every election that I…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / May 10, 2006 / Leave a comment

Law or Politics – The Peoples’ Choice

In the last thirty days, we have witnessed in operation the “checks and balances” that the architects of both the…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / April 3, 2006 / Leave a comment

Later Bloom in the Form of the Various Feminist Theories of Jurisprudence

As my last column published on February 3, 2006 ended, the “Legal Realists” and the “Critical Legal Studies” movement were…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / January 19, 2006 / Leave a comment

Should we leave the effort to reconcile the various jurisprudential philosophies to economists

As my last column closed, I asked whether we wish to leave the effort to reconcile the various jurisprudential philosophies…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / January 9, 2006 / Leave a comment

A Judge Cannot Have Any Agenda

“A Judge Cannot Have Any Agenda” Judge Samuel Alito’s Opening Statement Senate Judiciary Committee – January 9, 2006 We have…

Read More →

Judicial Philosophy / July 4, 2005 / Leave a comment

The “Legal Process School of Jurisprudence” a/k/a “Formalism”

The “Legal Process School of Jurisprudence” a/k/a “Formalism” was described in my last column. This view of how the legal…

Read More →

Page 3 of 4
  • ←
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • →
Grid List

  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular

Categories

  • Constitutional Law
  • Court Administration
  • Criminal Justice
  • Dispute Resolution
  • International Law
  • Judicial Philosophy
  • Law and Economics
  • Political Choices
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

May 30, 2025

Back To The Future

February 28, 2025

LAWYERS, JUDGES, AND EXPERTS: THEIR CHANGING RULES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

December 16, 2024

THE INTERSECTION OF ADVOCACY AND FINANCIAL FORENSICS: THE ROLE OF THE EXPERT IN 21 ST CENTURY DISPUTE RESOLUTION

September 13, 2022

Does Judicial Philosophy Make a Difference? 2022 Edition

August 15, 2022

The War Against Certification and Credentialing Organizations

Recent Posts

May 13, 2005

Chief Justice Roberts told the U.S. Senators he has no “overarching judicial philosophy”

May 21, 2005

However, the law is usually limited, as are judges, in what can be accomplished

July 4, 2005

The “Legal Process School of Jurisprudence” a/k/a “Formalism”

July 4, 2005

The Tempting of America

January 9, 2006

A Judge Cannot Have Any Agenda

  • Author
  • Contact Us
© A Pursuit of Justice is powered by WordPress & FancyThemes.